1.16.2005

Wired as Word as World

So all this buzz about hypertext and the noosphere over at Vortex Egg reminds me of the Myst video games. In its story, a race of people called the D'Ni had the power of writing worlds through an elaborate description of its every detail, even down to the workings of its physics; that could then be travelled to. This sounds an awfully lot like the internet, especially in light of how Metachor describes it as a self-organization towards collective consciousness. I imagine if we could write such a detailed world-book ourselves such a thing might be possible, and the net's stygmergic and collective nature lends itself to that purpose (interpretation). As more knowledge becomes linked through the web the limits of our collective understanding of existence expands. The biggest issue then would be providing greater access to it and a really damn effective organization for it. It's not the collective consciouss if we're not all conscious of it. I would kind of picture the inner workings of it like a vast multilayered correspondance chart, much like that found in magical texts (like Crowely's "777"), but each person would only see the nearer level links in their particular field of query.



The other interesting thing about the Myst games, was that though the linking world books were written in words, the games themselves were played out in a virtual world of symbols and sounds that had to be interpreted in order to procede. This is very similar to Vinge's portrayal of the Other Plane in "True Names," as well as many other sci-fi depictions of cyberspace, as a virtual space moved and manipulated within (assumably in a multi-dimensional way) by the user's avatar. As noted before, Vinge clothes this space in terms of elaborate and magical symbol-complexes that while appearing as actual rooms and objects also symbolic of the underlying processing of code that is their function. The article on transmogrification Metachor dug up points to this as well, saying that the Web weaves word and image together in such a dynamic way that "Cyberspace becomes visualized data, and meaning arrives in spatial as well as in verbal expressions." It then goes on to compare this to religious ritual and iconography: "While the sacred Word lives primarily in the hearts and mouths of believers, the transmission of the Word over generations takes place through the rituals and the artistic images adopted by the community of the faithful. Since the medieval period, for example, the Catholic Church surrounds its word-based rituals with music, paintings, architecture, gesture, and incense. Such communal art is deemed essential to the transmission of the Word as conceived primarily through spoken and written scriptures. The word on the page is passed along in a vessel of images, fragrances, songs, and kinesthetic pressed flesh. Elements like water, salt, and wine contribute to the communication. Truth is transmitted not only through spoken and written words but also through a participatory community that re-enacts its truths through ritual." In other words the knowledge is being passed along by an actual experiencing of the thing it is representative of. Word is transmitted (taught) by linking it to its phenomena. Prior to the advent of such common virtual reality necessary to implement a full scale symbolic search-space such a thing could appear in two dimensions as a collage of images that roll up behind the linked words, and offer a higher level interpretation to the word data being presented.



And since its computers, then the words are all just a higher level interpretation of numerical processes, and correspondances would have to be me made between the numbers and the words and the things as well, such as in numerological approaches to knowledge. Then with numbers for the lowest level agents instead of words we write worlds out of code, and find ourselves back in the matrix again.



To play the fool, I will point out that this whole process of words and symbols and representation in the net is remarkabley similair to being alive and interpreting and transmitting meaning from our everyday experiences. Until the net breaks through into some other world of omniscient existence it is only a mirror for the veil of our beliefs.

5 comments:

metachor said...

Curse you, Janus, get out of my head!

It was while playing Riven (Myst II) that many of these same ideas came to me; namely that metalanguages provide a tool for shaping collective interpretations of reality (or perhaps that is reality itself), and that religious institutions (whether the Catholic church or scientific academia or whoever else) perpetuate symbol-complex reality tunnels through learning rituals.

Is there much difference between adopting an avatar in a virtual cyber-world (especially a puzzle-based one as in the Myst worlds) and forming an astral body in a spiritual ritual-space? (See Crowley's working of the Enochian system in The Vision and the Voice). Both force the User to rely on established symbolic correspondences to interpret what are supposedly meaningful patterns in sensory data. And is there any difference between those and what we do when we create our reality every moment by interpreting the signals traveling through our sensory organs?

I wrote an essay about this at the time, though it is kind of not-good so I will cannibalize it for material for a future essay about these topics. Since you are into the Norse runic system, I wonder if you had conflated the myth of Odin hanging on Yggdrasil for 13 (?) days in order to discover the powers of the runic symbols with the concept of metalanguage reality-shaping? It is the same mythological archetype as contained in the Jesus of the Cross myth: qabalistically, Yeshua is Yod Heh Shin Vau Heh (YHSVH) in Hebrew, whereas Yahweh is Yod Heh Vau Heh (YHVH). Sounds like Christ was a metalanguage reality-hacker who really dug his teeth into the side of the currently reigning collective reality tunnel, in order to reinterpreted it.

Of course, you must see the parallels to the character of Flynn in the movie Tron... (renegade hacker and game programmer who gets digitized into a computer world where programs worship their Users as deities, who saves the day by crucifying himself in the code-matrix of a mad AI that was subverting all collective reality in both the digital and real worlds into a singular realty-paradigm based around itself as God). Is it crazy that I base my work and working belief structures off that archetype, when we watched that movie every couple days while growing up?

Anyway, all this is an essay I am tossing ideas around for, that may end up on Key23. Oh and I don't really mean to curse you, disregard that neurolinguistic attack.

Tait McKenzie said...

No meaning taken for your curses, metachor, though I enjoy reitterating and preitterating your thoughts thouroughly, though that's most likely just a part of the discourse of being twins.

As for the various myths that fall under the hanged man archetype, yes I was aware that they all spoke of metaprogramatic linguistic-reality shifting. This comes up in various native rituals as well, as in those which the seeker is hung from rings pierced through the flesh of their back, the pain of which induces them to surpass the ego and restructure the world. If anything that can be a potent lesson of this archetype, that metalinguistic programming must involve correlation to the physical world and it is through such visceral pain and the overwhelmingness of being that the brain can be imprinted with new information on the deepest levels. I was reading something a few days ago about meditation and sigils, probably on some chaos magic website, that said such meaningful signs can be wrapped into the conscioussness when one is in a state of egolessness brought on by meditation. This is akin to quieting the self to the point where it vanishes as opposed to the pain or ecstatic method, as in the sufi dervish dances, which escalates the noise of the self to the point where it vanishes. Either way the lesson seems to be that one must put themselves outside of their normal conscious state in order to effectively change it. Keep in mind even John C. Lilly did his metaprogramming work in isolation tanks that reproduced the calm of the womb.

I suppose the point of this comment would be that the net could not really alter our consciousness unless it could jar our attention in some rather visceral way, rather like a zen master hitting his students with his stick.

metachor said...

Well, the transmogrifying aspect of virtual reality (think Flynn digitized in Tron) could be that ego-jarring sensation necessary, though perhaps it would be more subtle than a quick shock as perpetuated in the hanged man archetype.

If consciousness could be more fully translated into the digital domain, boundaries on motion and action would fall away (making your avatar fly or have some form or abilities for manipulating the world that are quite different than what we can do with human bodies). This would at least expand the scope of the identity to more than our fleshy vessels of water, bone, nerve and tissue can present us.

Tait McKenzie said...

making your avatar fly or have some form or abilities for manipulating the world that are quite different than what we can do with human bodiessounds like a lucid dream to me...

metachor said...

What do you think I do in my lucid dreams?! Of course that is what I want to happen in my transmogrified cyber-reality. :)

Ideally, reality would be one grand metachoric experience, i.e. one "in which the normal perceptual environment is entirely replaced by a hallucinatory one, which may on occasion be a convincing replica of the world of normal perception." And perhaps it already is... our "normal" base states of consciousness are only that because of a statistically normative majority in the amount of time we spend in them. This does not mean they are any closer to being "actual reality" (or in another sense, any further from being entirely hallucinatory).