The other day James of that veiled gazelle and I were having an interesting conversation about the curious disconnect between anarchist philosophy and spiritual practices, and the handful of authors who write about both.
Anarchism comes from the Greek for "without archons (rulers)," and is defined by The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics as "the view that society can and should be organized without a coercive state." While this idea has divided into many (often conflicting) schools and sub-schools of thought, some general trends in belief emerge that are what originally attracted me to the ideal: Instead of meaning chaos and destruction, living without rulers, if it is to work at all, requires autonomy (self-rule/ DIY), equality (mutual respect for all others), pacifism (responsibility of getting along with oneself/ other/ the environment, etc), and not a small smattering of wide-eyed wonder. Of course, these are ideals, and like all social philosophies actual practice often falls far short of how people are expected to live (though it doesn't help that there are infinite negative interpretations on anarchism portrayed by the media and youth market). One of the main points where anarchist belief conflicts with itself is over what to do with religion and spirituality. For the most part, anarchists follow the creed of "no gods, no masters," rejecting religious behavior as no better than the opiate of the masses (probably a result of some of anarchism's roots in 18th Cent. Russian Communism). For example, a friend of mine considers herself both an anarchist and a Christian, which she does not see as being a conflict. However she has gotten an extraordinary amount of shit over the years from her anarchist friends because of her religious preferences, a kind of knee-jerk dogmatism that at times rejects anything remotely spiritual or mystical in favor of the pragmatic, rational, political, and all too real.
The irony being however that in its current incarnation, as a modern American youth movement drawing on its resurgence in the punk subculture, Anarchism has come to take on the trappings of a religion itself. A system of beliefs, a mode of dress (black, dirt, patches), a series of ritualistic practices (from train hopping to protesting), and a teleological doctrine (drawing on the Communist worker's uprising) that aims toward some utopia after the Revolution when everyone can take care of themselves and each other. Another common phrase: "Who will build the roads? We will!" It strikes me that even before this paradise is reached, it would be necessary for anarchists to apply their open ideals not just to themselves, but to everyone, drawing on a much more interesting belief that "nothing is true, everything is permitted," that all beliefs, even spiritual ones, are subjective and potentially valid. If one doubts the socio-political, revolutionary force of religion, look at Liberation Theology which in Latin America has attempted to do just that.
There are of course certain contemporary authors who have been somewhat successful in trying to unite principles of anarchism and spirituality (at least for a handful of people like James and I). The first one that comes to mind is Hakim Bey (full writings beyond link), whose tenets of Ontological Anarchy, and the Temporary Autonomous Zone find a direct correlation to certain occult ideas like the magic circle. In his more academic role as Peter Lamborn Wilson, he is an authority on the darker side of the Islamic mystical sect of Sufism. While criticized by anarchists for his mystical and individualist leanings, Bey is also openly a pederast, which is essentially waving a stick in the face of anyone who claims that they don't live by rules.
Another text that had a similar appeal was Days of War, Nights of Love. As an anarchist organization, Crimethinc. has gotten a lot of flack with the years, both at first for being too individualist and lifestyle, then for promoting irresponsible scrounging, and finally for becoming just another protest-centered anarcho-webpage. However, what first impressed me in their earlier writings, beyond the beautiful and often-times personal prose, was the sense of mystique they weaved around their organization: here were anarchists handing out secret invitations, discussing magic as direct action, and in fact weaving their own mythology in an effort to make it into their real world, which for a time actually seemed to work, and hopefully inspired countless other children to do the same.
Take for example this excerpt: "This world, the so-called “real world,” is just a front. Pull back the curtain and you’ll see the libraries are all filled with runaways writing novels, the highways are humming with escapees and sympathizers, all the receptionists and sensible mothers are straining at the leash for a chance to show how alive they still are. . . and all that talk of practicality and responsibility is just threats and bluffing to keep us from reaching out our hands to find that heaven lies in reach before us."
Perhaps one reason for Crimethinc.'s reliance on such mystical and utopian imagery was the involvement of one Mark Dixon, a friend of James, and a self-professed "folk scientist" most infamous for his use of think tanks (like highly focused temporary autonomous zones) for accomplishing all sorts of zany acts, like turning a bike into a record player. Most of the truly interesting, magical, and revolutionary writing in Days of War, Nights of Love seems to be credited to him. Among the many zines that he helped pen and pass around were two that I and others have come to call Anamnesis I and Anamnesis II, being absolutely chaotic and fun-house style (yes that is how the zines were originally formated) enquiries into many esoteric, yogic, and metaprogrammatic practices that are absolutely essential to anyone trying to live outside of even one's own rules (Anamnesis being the Platonic doctrine of psychic memory or the eternality of knowledge, an idea later articulated as the Theosophical Akashic Records, Hebrew Book of Life, or Sufi Khafi, and according to Wikipedia is "the closest that human minds can come to experiencing the freedom of the soul prior to its being encumbered by matter").
I am sure there are others writing about spirituality and anarchism in the same breath, though I am yet to find them. Any thoughts?
7.31.2008
Anarchism, Mysticism, and Anamnesis
Labels:
anarchy,
belief,
Bey,
Crimethinc,
critical theory,
culture,
inspiration,
literature,
memory,
punk,
religion,
subculture,
Sufi
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
thanks, i don't have time right now, but i will definitely check out anamnesis. a couple of others do come to my mind. starhawk is a famous pagan (wiccanish) author who is also an open and politically active anarchist. in fact, when james and i were arrested at a protest in DC, her coven was in a cell of the same jail, raising a cone of power with chanting. it was a pretty wonderful thing to encounter at that difficult time.
there are other anarchist pagan writers, including lasara firefox and t. thorne coyle, although they are not as famous as starhawk.
another project i have been curious about is the salivation army. i learned about it from that book of yours, generation hex, which actually seemed to cover a lot of similar topics although most of the projects didn't impress me that much. the salivation army one really intrigued me, though, and i have been on the lookout for their book or video ever since. basically, a queer punk artist named scott treleaven did a chaos magic spell that included making a zine called salivation army, to attract likeminded people. eventually he did attract a lot of people in a way that started to become pretty cultlike until the original author became concerned and disillusioned about the whole thing. apparently the book is a compendium of the zine, and the movie is about the history of the entire project.
ursula leguin is an author who writes mostly fiction that often has themes of both anarchism and nature-based spirituality.
tolstoy is pretty famous for being an anarchist christian.
and then there are people like derrick jensen, who seem to pretty much reject organized religion but really embrace earth spirituality. i think that this is actually one of the great things about the primitivist movement--it may be unrealistic in some ways, but i think it is also sort of a backlash against the spiritual sterility of mainstream anarchism.
i'm sure there are more. obviously this is a topic near and dear to my heart as well.
Thanks for your input. The only book of Starhawk's I've read was "The Fifth Sacred Thing," a utopian novel about a society of mages fighting against a totalitarian government. Seemed pretty anarchistic, though perhaps a little hoaky at points. Similarly, Ursual K. LeGuin's "The Disspossessed" is a pretty brilliant novel, based on the premise that the anarchists were given the moon to live on (but then all the factions start fighting with each other).
yep. starhawk's major book is "the spiral dance", which is one of the most famous witchcraft 101 books, written from a slightly political perspective. she has written more overtly political stuff more recently.
i liked the disposessed, but "always coming home" is probably my favorite novel. it's a utopian/dystopian novel set in the pacific northwest in a spiritual anarchist culture of the future.
I haven't read "Always Coming Home," do you have a copy? (If not I'm sure the library does).
Yeah, I do. You're welcome to borrow it. It's got a very interesting structure, which is sort of like an ethnography of this supposed future culture, including its poems, myths and so on.
well, i read the post, still haven't re-read the zines, but i have a few initial thoughts...
the first three points are nitpicky, but important. you mention "(peter lamborn wilson) is an authority on the darker side of the Islamic mystical sect of Sufism".
1. sufism is most likely pre-islamic. it was geographically dispersed but often found itself right along side of the growing islamic states. rather than conflict openly, much of sufism simply adopted shariah (islamic law) as a worthy vessel for an older teaching. some manifestations of sufism were even in outward conflict with one another, but this was sometimes purposeful. to quote (imperfectly) idries shah, "clapping hands seem in opposition to one another, but that opposition serves a common purpose to produce a sound"
2. what constitutes darker (and/or heretical) within islam, let alone sufism, is a matter of perspective. the splits are myriad within the spectrum of orthodox/heterodox/heresy. some of the heterodox and even heretical practices by some muslims worldwide have been "accepted" because without these syncretisms, much of the world would not have converted. iran would have remained largely zoroastrian for example. peter lamborn wilson is a scholar of islam and sufism and has taken great care to pick apart and analyze the branchings, although i would say his interest in sufism is deeper than mere classification.
3. on peter lamborn wilson and his "darker" ideas... there are widespread examples of pederasty in the ancient world. the fact he was able to locate some in early persian sufism shouldn't be taken to mean that sufism as a whole is pedophilic. the same should be said for p.l.w. locating examples of drug use within sufism... while there have been sects/sufis who were proponents of hash, opium, etc, many forbade it (there are drug use that i've heard of from a lebanese acquaintance who smoked chillum with sufis in a huge graveyard ritual in afghanistan. anyway, all i'm saying is that what was dark to one sect might have been light to another, and no historical or contemporary deliniation of these practices should read as a summary account for sufism as a whole. sufis famously signed the death warrant of fellow sufi hallaj, who proclaimed "i am the real!", don't forget. on p.l.w.'s personal appetite, i think there are interesting philosophical complexities at debate there and because a lot of my (potential) judgement of him has to do with the nature of his actual behavior, (which i don't know) i'm going to let that debate drift aside for now.
anyway, on to the topic at hand... spirituality and anarchy... why the mutual hate?
i think a lot of the misunderstanding on the anarchist side comes from equating any power-structure, especially large, centralized power to be suspect. seriously not much is more suspect than the vatican, save (maybe) giant armies of jihadi. the irony with that take is of course there are many spiritual paths who have similar fears. gnostics, jews and sufis all hiding from the inquisition comes to mind... also, many paths have similar anti-hierarchical notions. zen, tantra, hinduism and certain sufi sects come to mind (some sufis are super-hierarchical, but some are more horizontal in approach, most notably the hashisheen, who's leader hassan II declared the qiyamat, the dissolution of law, and made everyone in their tribe on the footing with god. this probably led to the clerics at alamut, their fortress, killing hassan... he had stripped them of their power!) also, the common anarchist mindset, which is essentially dogmatic scientific/materialist perspective fails to notice that many of the "scientific" concepts come directly out of "spiritual" traditions. see geber and paracelsus, for only two examples.
on the religious side, the same (hierarchy vs. horizontal) example can be used. a lot of traditions, like christianity, have this super-hierarchy of god, angels, pope, etc... so a concept of individualism can seem very contrary to that idea. however in modern times there are some interesting examples of people getting over that paradox. zack exley of revolution in jesusland is documenting some of the recent attempts for fusions of left and far-left political values with right and far-right religious practices. christianarchy! it's not a small movement, either. it comes from the strong tradition of liberation theology also see the anarchist hasidic sect the neturi karta, the anarchist zen work of brad warner and (though i hate to even mention this guy), aleister crowley, the occult scientist who famously said "do what thou wilt is the whole of the law"... he (mostly) wisely prescribed a scientific approach to magic/spirituality all the while being (by most accounts) a violent, sexist, bigoted drug-addicted elitist.
also i want to say that you are absolutely right, modern anarchism has in many ways built it's own dogmatic practice. critique of this single-minded orthodoxy of whatever, science, religion, political ideology, is what was so wonderful about reading robert anton wilson. he in many ways is the most successful (popular) modern alchemist of these "conflicting" concepts.
a lot the "work" i see now is in synthesizing "opposites", luddite/technofeteshist, individual/collective, spiritual/material, anarchist/facist, rich/poor, etc... i think there are facets of all of these tendencies in everyone, although in different arrangements and at different ratios. i refer to the job description navigating these difficult powers and flows as "synergeon". it's tough work, if you can stand it, but i think down that road leads scientific honesty and spiritual awareness.
@ James- Yes thank you for clarifying those points about P.L.W. and Sufism. As we'd discussed in person I haven't read too much of that side of his work, so now I have a lot more to go on. Also thanks for the other links and thinks, I had completely forgotten to mention Robert Anton Wilson, whose work definitely contains the seeds of freeing one's mind from all dogmas.
And enjoy those zines!
Post a Comment